Justpoint Get a Free Case Review
Endotak Lead Injury

Injured by a defibrillation lead system?

In July 2025, the FDA announced a voluntary recall of Boston Scientific Endotak Reliance ePTFE-coated defibrillation leads after a calcification defect was found to prevent life-saving shocks from being delivered. As of July 24, 2025, Boston Scientific reported 386 serious injuries and 16 patient deaths linked to this issue.

Learn more →

Free Case Review

A case specialist will follow up within two business days.
Strict filing deadlines may apply; do not wait.

Confidential No Obligation No fee unless we recover
SSL Secured - Your information is private

As seen on

WSJ
Business Insider
Bloomberg
CBS
ABC
ABA
NBC
FOX
Forbes
Reuters
WSJ
Business Insider
Bloomberg
CBS
ABC
ABA
NBC
FOX
Forbes
Reuters

Who Qualifies

We focus on serious injuries from device failures.

To pursue a claim, there must be an injury caused by a device failure, supported by documentation.

You may qualify if

  • You were hospitalized due to a cardiac event associated with device failure.
  • You required a lead replacement or extraction surgery due to the defect.
  • You experienced a cardiac event or failed shock delivery linked to rising lead impedance.
  • You have medical records documenting the injury.
  • The injury happened within your state’s filing deadline.

You may not qualify if

  • The reported injury does meet the internal criteria for this matter.
  • You have no medical documentation of the event or device issue.
  • You are already represented by another attorney for this matter.
  • The statute of limitations has already expired in your state.

FDA Actions, 2025

What the FDA found.

The FDA has identified recalls involving certain Boston Scientific ENDOTAK RELIANCE defibrillation leads as Class I recalls, the agency’s most serious recall category. According to the FDA, certain leads with ePTFE-coated coils may develop calcification over time, which can interfere with the delivery of intended defibrillation shocks and may require early replacement. The FDA stated that the issue has been associated with reports of serious injuries and deaths, and recommended ongoing monitoring and evaluation by healthcare providers.

FDA Class I · 2025

Boston Scientific Endotak Reliance ePTFE-Coated Leads (2002–2021)

The ePTFE coating on the shocking coils can develop calcium deposits over time. Calcification insulates the coils, gradually increasing lead impedance. As impedance rises, the device may be unable to deliver a shock during cardiac arrest. As of July 24, 2025: 386 serious injuries and 16 deaths reported. ~354,000 leads in service. Most common outcome: early lead replacement (1 in 238 at 10 years). Extraction of long-implanted leads carries an additional serious risk due to calcification.

Supporting Research

Heart Rhythm Journal (2025)

A peer-reviewed analysis linked coil calcification in Endotak Reliance leads to progressively rising high-voltage impedance, consistent with the defect described in the recall.

PO-06-127 PROGRESSIVE HIGH-VOLTAGE IMPEDANCE RISE IN BOSTON SCIENTIFIC ENDOTAK RELIANCE ICD LEADS
Supporting Research

Heart Rhythm Journal (2025) — Impedance Management

A case series documented an increase in high-voltage impedance as a mechanism of failure in transvenous ICD leads, with implications for the management of affected patients.

Supporting Research

JACC Real-World Analysis (March 2026)

A review of FDA MAUDE reports from January 2000 through September 2025 found 2,378 reported events for Endotak Reliance leads post-recall: 57.4% injuries, 42.3% malfunctions, and 0.25% deaths. High impedance was present in 26.9% of cases; 54.9% required lead replacement or extraction. Reported complications included infection, inappropriate shocks, and asystole.

Class II recall posted April 10, 2026. Warning letter issued January 28, 2026.

Common Injuries

Injuries that may support a legal claim

When a defibrillator lead fails to deliver a shock, a patient in cardiac arrest may not receive the intervention they need to survive.

Failure to Deliver a Shock

Calcification raises impedance to the point where the device cannot discharge during a life-threatening arrhythmia.

Cardiac Arrest or Death

Patients who experience ventricular fibrillation without a functioning ICD may suffer cardiac arrest. The recall is linked to 16 patient deaths as of July 2025.

Lead Replacement or Extraction Surgery

Over half of reported cases required lead replacement or extraction — a procedure that itself carries serious risks, especially when the lead has been implanted for many years.

Required Resuscitation

Some patients survived a cardiac event only after external resuscitation, which the FDA identified as one of the most serious possible outcomes of lead failure.

Inappropriate Shocks or Device Alerts

Some patients experienced inappropriate shocks or persistent device alerts due to abnormal impedance readings, resulting in distress and requiring medical intervention.

Infection & Surgical Complications

Lead extraction procedures carry a risk of infection, vascular injury, and other surgical complications that can require extended hospitalization.

How It Works

What happens after you submit.

No upfront cost. No obligation. Free review of whether your situation fits the criteria.

01

Submit Your Information

Answer a short set of questions — under 2 minutes. Your information is kept confidential.

02

Talk to a Case Specialist

A specialist will reach out within two business days to learn more about your situation and answer your questions.

03

Review Your Options

If your case qualifies, we connect you with an experienced attorney. No fee unless we recover.

Contact us

Have questions?

Reach out directly, and a case specialist will get back to you.

[email protected]
Start Free Case Review →